Exploring the effectiveness of endometrial receptivity array and immune profiling in patients with multiple implantation failure：A retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA), endometrial immune profiling, and a combination of both in improving the pregnancy outcomes for multiple implantation failure patients. According to patients' willingness, 1429 women who incurred at least two or more consecutive implantation failures in IVF/ICSI treatment opted for frozen embryo transfer and were divided into four groups: 'No test', 'Immune Profiling', 'ERA' and 'ERA+ Immune Profiling'. Women in three test groups underwent timed endometrial biopsy for ERA, immune profiling, a combination of both. We observed the overall incidence rates of the displaced window of implantation (WOI) and endometrial immune dysregulation were 75.14% and 79.29%, respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), our data revealed that the 'ERA' and 'ERA + Immune Profiling' groups demonstrated significantly higher rates of biochemical, clinical, ongoing pregnancy, and implantation compared to the 'No test' group (p < 0.01). The 'Immune Profiling' group showed a higher implantation rate compared to 'No test' group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, when comparing three test groups, the 'ERA + Immune Profiling' group exhibited notably higher rates of clinical and ongoing pregnancy compared to the 'Immune Profiling' group (p < 0.017). However, there was no association between endometrial immune profiling and ERA phases, and their results did not differ between embryo implantation and non-implantation in these patients. Our findings underline the increased implantation rates by use of ERA and endometrial immune profiling in patients with multiple implantation failure, either individually or corporately. Moreover, a combination of both could improve their pregnancy outcomes significantly.

miR-146a-5p enhances embryo survival in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion by promoting M2 polarization of decidual macrophages.

Unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) is one of the most challenging conditions in the reproductive field, and macrophage M1/M2 polarization disorder is involved in URSA pathogenesis, although the relevant mechanisms are undefined. miR-146a-5p possesses an immunoregulatory role and is expressed in decidual immune cells, and this study aims to investigate its effect on decidual macrophage polarization and therapeutic prospects in URSA, which has never been reported. The levels of M1/M2 markers in the deciduae and the miR-146a-5p expression in the decidual macrophages of URSA and healthy pregnant women were first detected and analyzed. Then, the in vitro effect of miR-146a-5p on the M1/M2 polarization and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines was investigated in Tamm-Horsfall protein-1 (THP-1)-induced macrophages. Finally, the in vivo immunotherapeutic effect of miR-146a-5p on embryo survival and the potential mechanisms were evaluated in a murine model of immune-based URSA. As a result, the abnormal M1/M2 polarization, which showed a shift towards the M1 phenotype and correlated with the decreased expression of miR-146a-5p, was verified in human URSA decidual macrophages. miR-146a-5p could inhibit M1 polarization, promote M2 polarization, and result in an anti-inflammatory microenvironment in THP-1-induced macrophages. The intravenous injection of exogenous miR-146a-5p in the first trimester of pregnant URSA mice significantly reduced the embryo resorption rate and promoted the M2 polarization of decidual macrophages. In conclusion, miR-146a-5p enhances embryo survival in URSA by promoting decidual macrophage polarization toward an M2 phenotype, giving new ideas and potential targets for subsequent research on the pathogenesis and immunotherapeutic strategies of URSA.

Effectiveness comparison between endometrial receptivity array, immune profiling and the combination in treating patients with multiple implantation failure.

PROBLEM: The clinical value of endometrial receptivity array (ERA), endometrial immune profiling, or a combination of both for multiple implantation failure patients is unclear. METHOD OF STUDY: One hundred and seventy-two women with a history of at least two or more consecutive implantation failures in IVF/ICSI treatment were included. According to patients' willingness, they were divided into four groups, 'no treatment', 'Immune Profiling', 'ERA' and 'ERA + Immune Profiling'. Endometrial biopsy was examined by ERA, immune profiling alone, or combination, and intention was adopted accordingly. Pregnancy outcomes were compared, and the association between ERA phases and endometrial immune profiling was also assessed. RESULTS: The overall incidence rate of the displaced window of implantation (WOI) and endometrial immune dysregulations were 84.9% and 75.3%, respectively. Implantation rate was significantly higher in the 'ERA + Immune Profiling' group than the 'no treatment' group (P = .007). Clinical pregnancy rate was somewhat improved in the three treatment groups but with a borderline significance (P = .071). After controlling for other confounders, 'ERA + Immune Profiling' treatment was associated with a higher pregnancy rate [aOR (95%CI)  = â€Š3.412 (1.387-8.395), P = .008]. There was no association between endometrial immune profiling and ERA phases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the high incidence of displaced WOI and endometrial immune dysregulation in multiple implantation failure patients. The combination of ERA and endometrial immune profiling is more likely to have clinical value than ERA or immune profiling alone. These data suggested the unsubstitutability of ERA and endometrial immune profiling on the treatment outcome for multiple implantation failure patients.

miR-146a-5p improves the decidual cytokine microenvironment by regulating the toll-like receptor signaling pathway in unexplained spontaneous abortion.

Spontaneous abortion (SA) is a common pregnancy failure, but the cause of numerous cases remains unexplained. Decidual immune cells (DICs)-mediated cytokine microenvironment is involved in pregnancy and regulated by many microRNAs, but whether microRNA-146a-5p (miR-146a) regulate the decidual cytokine microenvironment and the potential mechanisms in unexplained SA pathogenesis have rarely been reported. In this study, the levels of cytokines and miR-146a in healthy and unexplained SA deciduae were first investigated, and the correlation between them was analyzed. Then, the effect of miR-146a inhibitor on cytokines was assessed in healthy deciduae-derived DICs. Third, the downstream targets and related molecular mechanisms of miR-146a were analyzed by bioinformatics, and the levels of the predicted targets in deciduae were assessed, followed by the correlation analysis between the levels of miR-146a and the targets. Finally, the effect of miR-146a on the predicted targets and inflammatory cytokines was validated in unexplained SA deciduae-derived DICs. As a result, decreased miR-146a correlated with the cytokine disorder in unexplained SA deciduae, and inhibition of miR-146a promoted pro-inflammatory response in healthy deciduae-derived DICs. One hundred four target genes and related molecular mechanisms of miR-146a were predicted, among which the toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway might be associated with the decidual cytokine regulation. Upregulation of miR-146a inhibited the expression of the predicted molecules enriched in the TLR pathway and improved the cytokine disorder in unexplained SA deciduae-derived DICs. Collectively, miR-146a improves the decidual cytokine microenvironment by regulating the TLR pathway in unexplained SA, providing novel potential targets for further therapeutic research.